Galarsa v. Dolgen California, Inc.
California Appellate Court
- Home
- Retail Litigation Center
- Galarsa v. Dolgen California, Inc.
Date: June 3, 2025
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief describes why PAGA plaintiffs cannot disavow “individual” PAGA claims in order to avoid arbitration and go forward with “representative” PAGA claims in court (“headless PAGA”).
Coalition: The RLC was joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the California Retail Association.
Counsel: Tritia Murata, James Sigel, Byung-Kwan Park, and Natalie Fox of Davis Wright Tremaine drafted the brief
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief describes why PAGA plaintiffs cannot disavow “individual” PAGA claims in order to avoid arbitration and go forward with “representative” PAGA claims in court (“headless PAGA”).
Coalition: The RLC was joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the California Retail Association.
Counsel: Tritia Murata, James Sigel, Byung-Kwan Park, and Natalie Fox of Davis Wright Tremaine drafted the brief