Open

RLC Amicus Briefs


Advocacy Division Legal Briefs

The Advocacy Division currently files about 20 amicus briefs per year totaling more than 200 to date.

Below are cases that the Advocacy Division has participated in.

248 Results

Filter Results

Fausett v. Walgreen Company

  • Legal Brief
  • 06/04/2025

The RLC’s brief at the Supreme Court of Illinois explains why no-injury plaintiffs cannot bring FACTA claims in state court. Learn More

Galarsa v. Dolgen California, Inc.

  • Legal Brief
  • 06/03/2025

The RLC's brief describes why PAGA plaintiffs cannot disavow “individual” PAGA claims to pursue “representative” PAGA claims. Learn More

Clinton v. Amazon Logistics, Inc.

  • Legal Brief
  • 06/03/2025

The RLC's brief analyzes the FAA's transportation worker exemption as it relates to warehouse and last mile workers. Learn More

Walsh v. Dollar Tree Stores

  • Legal Brief
  • 05/27/2025

The RLC’s ND Ca. brief explains the impact of CIPA class suits wrongly alleges the statute applies to online tools. Learn More

Silva v. Schmidt Baking Distribution

  • Legal Brief
  • 05/19/2025

The RLC’s 2nd Circuit brief explains why the FAA’s transportation worker exemption does not include contracts between businesses. Learn More

Walmart Inc. v. Golikov

  • Legal Brief
  • 03/30/2025

The RLC’s explains the importance of abiding by Rule 23’s requirements at class certification. Learn More

Linney's Pizza, LLC v. Board of Governors of the Federal Res

  • Legal Brief
  • 02/26/2025

The RLC’s brief provides the merchant perspective on swipe fees in a Reg II challenge. Learn More

Hohenshelt v. Golden State Foods Corp.

  • Legal Brief
  • 02/10/2025

The RLC's brief explains that the FAA preempts a California arbitration statute. Learn More

Gutierrez v. Converse, Inc.

  • Legal Brief
  • 01/22/2025

The RLC's brief explains that CIPA's wiretapping clause should not apply to the internet. Learn More

Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits

  • Legal Brief
  • 12/20/2024

The RLC’s brief explains that the statute does not support plaintiff’s interpretation of “job applicant,” discusses the failure to establish... Learn More

Stay in the know

Subscribe to our newsletter